Handbrake blu ray encode very big11/8/2023 ![]() For x265 I would suggest the following guide: https //community/show/how-encode-staxrip-joybell-x265-hevc-10bit/ There are tutorials there for both Staxrip and Handbrake. ![]() On the other hand if you want to get the file size down as small as possible, even if it takes longer, then do x265. At 4 gb you could have a full resolution (1080p), x264 file that would look very good, as in difficult to distinguish from the original blu ray. It is true that for a given file size x265 will give higher quality, but at a certain point the difference is negligible. My advice to you is this - if all you want to do is compress your Blu Rays to less than 4 gb in the shortest time possible then do x264 encoding instead, it will be much faster than x265. I have used both Handbrake and Staxrip to do x265 encoding, personally I prefer Staxrip as it is more powerful, but it is more complicated to use. I know those qualities I am asking are a lot, but you never know.Įdit 1: I did try like 20 different settings for "preview" I found the "best one" but once I put the whole Blu ray to be done that way, the time grew exponentially from what I calculated on the "Preview" to its actual time. However, if anyone has like a "perfect" encoding settings to make it about 15 hours of encoding, plus a small size and good quality, please let me know. I've only done 3 blu rays but, so far, the quality in his 60 inch TV looked good.Īs long as he doesn't compare it to his Blu Ray (I hope), I should be ok.īut I will report later, once such comparisons (inevitably) happens. (2 pass encode)Īlso by down-scaling from 1920 to 1600, or 1440 sometimes. this produces a file, depending on the blu ray of about 3.5gb and it takes about 15 hours to encode. I managed to bring down the time to about 12 hours by putting the Avg Bitrate (kbps) to about 3-3.5k. So with H265, I am giving up time, but the file stays lower in size, so what I am basically doing is giving up, is time for size. Well, its a combination of both time and space. (I am willing to take some degradation of video) But I dont want the end result to look THAT crappy either. I dont want the file to be bigger than 4gb, as the computer I am giving him is a Dell Optiplex 380 (old) that I dont know will be able to handle higher bitrates. So as it stands, Handbrake is telling me, it will take 25 hours to encode a 2hours and 20 minutes Blu ray movie.Īre there any other recommended settings? Video: H.265(x265), Constant Quality=20 RF Preset: very slow (did this because somewhere i read it makes it a very small file.Īudio: English DTS AC3 Passthru. Picture: 1280x720 (downgrading from 1920x1080) because that seems to affect the speed a lot. Processor: AMD (FX) 4130 Quad Core Processor 3.80 ghz Motherboard: MSI 760GM-P34 FX (with latest drivers/flash) Video Card: Nvidia (EVGA GeForce GTX 960 Super Clocked ACX 2.0 4GB GDDR5 128 Bit Graphic Card (04G-P4-3962-KR) with latest drivers My uncle has like over 100 dvd's and about 40-50 Blu-rays!įirst I will give you the transcoding computer specs: After talking he asked me if I could transcode his library also to a HTPC kind of setting which I am happy to do however, I hit a wall when I started to transcode Blu-Rays. However, once in Hawaii, my uncle happens to have a somewhat large collection of BLU-Ray/DVD's. I moved to Hawaii and I used to have a very large collection of DVD's which the wife said no, to shipping from the mainland to Hawaii, so 3 years ago, I discovered and used Handbrake to rip all my moves to my hard drive and get rid of the DVD's.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply.AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |